1-5 October 2018
Africa/Johannesburg timezone
<em><u><strong><font color="purple"><font size=5>International Conference on Physics Education (ICPE) 2018</font></font></strong></u></em>

Exploring Physics Student Graduate Preparedness vis-à-vis the 2018 SAIP Benchmark Statement

2 Oct 2018, 09:30
20m
PELINDABA 1

PELINDABA 1

Oral Presentation Track A - Physics at University Parallel Session 1

Speaker

Mr Bako Nyikun Audu (University of the Western Cape)

Description

The 2018 SAIP Benchmark Statement (SAIP 2018, 22-23) has many similar fundamental “graduate attributes” to the British (IOP 2014) and the American (American Association of Physics Teachers 2011; American Center for Physics 2014; Heron and McNeil 2016) benchmark statements. Some of these graduate attributes are extremely difficult to evaluate in terms of implementation practices (how these get written into module descriptors and how teachers implement these) and how student experience these SAIP intended attributes. These are difficult to evaluate because they deal with human capabilities as a function of physics knowledge and working practices both in physics and in society. Of particular relevance for this presentation are the recommended ethical, communicative, problem solving, ICT, analytical, investigative, and personal skills (see p.22, SAIP 2018). The presentation will propose a novel methodological way of doing this that has empirical components that are built on substantive theorizing of Human Capability (Alkire and Black 1997, 263-279; Fraser and Greenhalgh 2001, 799-803; Hart 2012, 275-282) rather than on rhetorical statements. This approach will be illustrated with case study data collected from one of South Africa’s leading departments of physics, and the implications of such research outcome will be discussed. Key words: SAIP Physics benchmark statement, Human Capability, graduate attributes, novel methodology. References Alkire, Sabina and Rufus Black. 1997. "A Practical Reasoning Theory of Development Ethics: Furthering the Capabilities Approach." Journal of International Development 9 (2): 263-279. doi:AID-JID439>3.3.CO;2-4. American Association of Physics Teachers. 2011. Making and Sustaining Changes in Undergraduate Physics Programs at Research Universities. Maryland, USA: AAPT. American Center for Physics. 2014. Graduate Education in Physics: The Path Ahead. Maryland, USA: APS & AAPT. Fraser, S. W. and T. Greenhalgh. 2001. "Coping with Complexity: Educating for Capability." BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 323 (7316): 799-803. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11588088. Hart, Caroline Sarojini. 2012. "The Capability Approach and Education." Cambridge Journal of Education 42 (3): 275-282. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2012.706393. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305764X.2012.706393. Heron, Paula and Laurie McNeil. 2016. Phys21:Preparing Physics Students for 21st-Century Careers. MD, USA: American Physical Society. IOP. 2014. The Physics Degree: Graduate Skills Base and the Core of Physics. 1st Edition ed. London: Institute of Physics. SAIP. 2018. "SA Physics Benchmark Statement." Physics Comments, 22-23.

Primary author

Mr Bako Nyikun Audu (University of the Western Cape)

Presentation Materials

There are no materials yet.