4-8 July 2016
Kramer Law building
Africa/Johannesburg timezone
<a href="http://events.saip.org.za/internalPage.py?pageId=10&confId=86">The Proceedings of SAIP2016</a> published on 24 December 2017

Probing students perceptions of first year physics labs: a focus on learning and enjoyment aspects

5 Jul 2016, 10:00
20m
2B (Kramer Law building)

2B

Kramer Law building

UCT Middle Campus Cape Town
Oral Presentation Track E - Physics Education Physics Education

Speaker

Ms Munene Tlowana (Student)

Level for award<br>&nbsp;(Hons, MSc, <br> &nbsp; PhD, N/A)?

N/A

Would you like to <br> submit a short paper <br> for the Conference <br> Proceedings (Yes / No)?

No

Abstract content <br> &nbsp; (Max 300 words)<br><a href="http://events.saip.org.za/getFile.py/access?resId=0&materialId=0&confId=34" target="_blank">Formatting &<br>Special chars</a>

As part of a broader initiative to probe students’ experience of first year physics laboratories, a written instrument, Perceptions of Physics Labs Questionnaire (PPLQ) was developed. The PPLQ comprises 5 questions probing the following: expectations, enjoyment, learning, perceived correlation of theory done in lectures and lab work, and notions of the relationship between theory and experiments in physics. Each question on the PPLQ was constructed around a debate offering various opinions, followed by: (1) a Forced Choice Responses (FCR) in which a particular opinion has to be chosen and (2), a Free Writing Response (FWR) in which the reasons for the choice are explained. In a previous talk the analysis of the FCR’s was presented for the 5 probes. In this talk the emphasis will be on the analysis of the FWR’s for two of the key probes, namely, Enjoyment and Learning. The data were analyzed using the approach suggested by Grounded Theory. Based on a sample of written responses, a coding scheme was developed. Thus, starting with a fine-grained level of coding, a number of categories emerged that were then used to analyze the full data set. The results from the exercise will be discussed in detail. Further exploration of the data suggests that the detailed responses can be viewed as either positive or negative manifestations of two underlying constructs, Socio-Emotional and Knowledge-Skills, that can be used to characterize the overall lab experience.

Apply to be<br> considered for a student <br> &nbsp; award (Yes / No)?

No

Please indicate whether<br>this abstract may be<br>published online<br>(Yes / No)

Yes

Main supervisor (name and email)<br>and his / her institution

Saalih Allie
saalih.allie@gmail.com
University of Cape Town

Primary author

Ms Munene Tlowana (Student)

Co-author

Prof. Saalih Allie (UCT)

Presentation Materials

There are no materials yet.